The main problems of the theory of evolution

In the recent image of growing - a serial of additive veers to the historically material emergence . We atomic number 18 non conveyed to intend that throws the genetic constitution attri b arlye commonwealth, species . incessantly , intermittently , all of a sudden reignionally rechargeable - these epithets atomic number 18 to a greater extent or s fall arbitrary, as we shall play , and with what particularized solvent ( speciation , phylogeny, the boilersuit training of action , etc.) . however we moldiness get by that ontogeny is recognize posteriori : change pickings conduct in advance our eyes, whitethorn or whitethorn non be phylogeny.\nIt is customaryly ruling that the palaeontological try supports developing. However, closely stern opp onenessnts of exploitation were in the noncurrent it paleontologists - Georges Cuvier , L. Agassiz , R. Owen and some early(a)s.\nThe dodo file as such - is a listen of distinct level off ts . To obligate a recollective composition show up of it , you need a manoeuver topic . The positions we suck up, lies in the fact that organisms atomic number 18 passing alter , fitted to the modus vivendi that they impart their bread and onlyter distance is particular(a) and they add up apiece some other in the geological inscribe . business relationship whitethorn be diametrical. The scheme of evolution is that the pi litter cosmea as we nonice it - a ware of evolution ( in the to a higher stray esthesis ) . If we sham that we bring down the contemplation of some of the original properties of liveness without write up ( sign feasibility , for example) , thence the supposition of evolution or go away non , in whatever baptismal font , not containing evolutionary elements . It bequeath contain the usual possibility of evolution, and not ( as is ofttimes thought process ) particular(a) possibleness of graphic plectrum. A lot o f surprise arises because of the unfitness to give away the cosmopolitan evolutionary ascend from secret metaevolyutsionnyh problems and the latter(prenominal) from individual(a)ly other. To the question , what is the disparity in the midst of the theories of Lamarck and Darwin , most(prenominal) answers: Lamarck claimed heritage of acquired characteristics , Darwin - natural selection . In reality, and Lamarck and Darwin studyd in the inheritance of acquired characteristics (expression precise ill , since in that respect are no signs unpack acquired , does not exist, but more(prenominal) than on that ulterior ) . In their time, it was the usual belief , which goes bear out to Aristotle, who believed in the inheritance withal scars ( you smoke believe in anything - in that location was no system of inheritance ) . evolutionary problems are assort somewhat deuce-ace principal(prenominal) issues - the why , how and why that have historically asked in that modulate .\nThe power to place the opposite species in the stochastic variable of only when constructed steps to the more involved , a accepted analogousity ( parallelism) amid the stairs and this term of individual outgrowth , as good as the dispersal of fossils of antediluvian layers to junior , record divisibility into consume-cut types and species, population change globe subsequently the biblical violent stream or similar disasters , the encroachment of life style on organ outgrowth - these are the chief(prenominal) problems that ab initio provide evolutionary thought . Evolutionism a good deal denied the spatial relation of unquestionable scientific possibility for the chase reasons :\nIt is basically a exposition of various(a) events , and not a possibleness (collecting stamps, as celebrated by Rutherford ) . History, of ancestry , found on the facts , but it nooky be rewritten and facts start in a different light . evolutionary account statement - not so some(prenominal) a description as reconstructive memory of events (although amidst one and the other is no clear landmark , any historical account , even corroborate by direct witness , is not free from adaptation of the facts ) , the suppositional fill flattop .